Category Archives: hiring and firing

Pick Your Staff Like You Pick Your Fruit

As a parent, I was told and believed that parents are the greatest influence on the character and success of our children. And it’s not true. Believing that only served to make me waste time doing things that weren’t effective, and made be feel guilty and ashamed when I failed as a parent, and made me act like a controlling asshole. Best of intentions, poor behaviour, bad results.

Turns out that the greatest influence on a child’s character is not her parents, but rather friends in school and out. So, if we have so little influence, what can we do? Help our children pick their friends? Help them learn how to choose their friends?

You Can Pick Your Friends

A friend of mine shared with me how she taught her son to choose his friends like you would choose your fruit. Pick the ones that are mature and ripe and flavorful. And if you find a rotten one, don’t keep it around.

I believe the same is true of whom we choose to surround ourselves with as adults. Our peers, professional colleagues, and friends are a great influence on us in our day-to-day lives, and the research bears this out. We’re more like to be able to quit smoking, lose weight, or exercise regularly if we choose to spend our time in the company of others who do the same, for example.

I believe the same is true of choosing friends with a positive attitude. Not a Polly-Anna make-believe optimism. A positive attitude that helps us get through the hard times, celebrates our successes, and helps us enjoy life when we can.

I believe the same is true for those we chose to work for or with. If you’re a hiring manager you have a huge influence on the outcome of the success of the company. Hiring the right people may not guarantee success, but hiring the wrong people is a sure-fire way to fail.

Who you choose to hire is the greatest influence on the success of your company. A-players hire and are attracted to other A players. A-players will not tolerate working for or with B and C-players for very long. They have a choice, even in a recession, of where to work, and they will take it.

B-players hire C-players because they do not want to feel threatened. B and C-players cost the company not only in terms of lost productivity, but also lost opportunities, demoralized staff, dissatisfied customers, and the extra effort it takes to manage them. They infect everything they touch. The cost of hiring the wrong person is five times their salary and up. They are literally a rotten apple that will turn an entire barrel of apples into a stinking, rotting mess.

Most people leave a job because of their boss, or because their boss tolerates poor performance in others. Not because of money. Even though that’s what they tell you. (Except maybe in Alberta and Saskatchewan because of our weird oil and gas economics, and I believe that’s about to come to an end.) So C-player supervisors and managers drive A players out of the company.

Personally I like Robert I. Sutton’s “no asshole rule“. I found it delightful that simply by telling candidates in the hiring interview that, “By the way, if you’re an asshole, I’ll fire you.”, had the effect of screening out a majority of abusive behaviour from the first day. Some candidates, after being confronted with such a clear boundary around expected behaviour, simply didn’t take the offer. Which I imagine was just fine by Mr. Sutton.

Finding a New Job – First Things First

Just recorded my first podcast with Karl, on the subject of getting clear what you want from work before running out and getting your next job.

Here’s to many more! Find the podcast at White Noise blog. Stand by for the iTunes pod-casting link!

Getting Rid of Your Deadbeats, Downers, and ***holes – What the Evidence Shows

What impact does getting rid of your non-performers have on a team? 30 to 40% increase in productivity.

What are you keeping them around? I don’t know either.

What You Should Look For When Hiring From the Outside: Look Inside

Interesting article from Inc.com, most of which is fluff, but has one good piece of advice:

5. For behavioral traits you want, look at existing employees.

How to Hire the Right People and Stop Hiring the Wrong Ones

hiringAccording to Brad Smart, the cost of making a hiring mistake is 5 to 27 times their annual salary. The higher up in the company they are, the more damage they can do. This means hiring the “right” people can make or break a company. If your company, no matter how big or small, doesn’t have a hiring strategy or plan, then you’re probably shooting yourself in the foot fairly regularly.

. . . and like anything else, the rate of change is accelerating. Inc. Magazine updates us on the New Rules of Hiring.

When (and When Not) to Perform an Interview

Interviews aren’t just for filling empty positions with an outside candidate. There are at least two other triggers for conducting a disciplined, comprehensive job interview:

  • Put internal candidates through the interview process – basing a promotion or internal move on your gut and what you think you know about a candidate is a bad idea. The biggest influence any manager will ever have, and the most critical function we perform is the selection, promotion, and develop of people. If this is your biggest influence in an organization, then why would you do a half-assed job based on incomplete, subjective information?
  • Interview you new team – as managers we manage people, finding their strengths, and making sure that they have the tools, training, and ability to come to work every day and do their best. Spending a couple of hours up front with every member of your new team is a great way to get a head start on our ability to do this.Bonus: they get to learn about you. Which builds trust.

When shouldn’t you interview? As a courtesy. If a candidate really doesn’t have the prior experience or performance to do the job, then you’re not doing anybody a favour by being dishonest and leading them on about their suitability for the job.

This HBR article goes into detail on how to conduct an internal interview.

Chose the Right Test

One of my clients recently told me that running his business is so much easier with the right people. Hiring the right people (and helping the wrong ones become “available to industry”) has fundamentally unstuck his company. Now he faces the prospect of hiring to fill for the blank spots.

Let’s be clear: hiring the wrong person can put your company under. The cost of making a mistake is enormous. Not only the cost of that salary, but your time, the impact to other people in your company, your clients, lost opportunities, having to go through the hiring process over again, and others impacts.

Checking for training, experience and knowledge is easy. Either they have it or they don’t. Hiring for character, attitude, and fit are harder. One arrow in our quiver are personality tests, but not all personality tests are created equal.

The Meyers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), for example, is a fairly well-known and widely used profile tool. It’s used by everybody except psychologists. That’s because it gives inconsistent results. This means if you take the test more than once you’ll likely get a different outcome. It is also uses only positive language so that you don’t get any insight into weaknesses and blind-spots in your own behaviour you might need to manage.

If you use a profiling tool, make sure the tool you are using is research-based and validated. The kind that will hold up in court validation, and you can’t *just* rely on profiling tools. Having a disciplined process and HR strategy is critical to your company. Remember the cost of hiring the wrong person?

A disciplined hiring process includes using other tools, such as phone screening, career histories, two-person in-depth interviews, learning how to ask behavioural interview questions properly, actually interviewing references, and having an on-boarding process for new hires.

An HR strategy includes regularly reviewing staff performance, using the same hiring process for selecting for promotion, and  documenting your expectations from staff both in terms of performance *and* behaviour. By behaviour I mean is your receptionist friendly and organized? Does your engineer pay attention to details? Does your salesperson know how to build relationships with a variety of personalities?

If you’ve ever been promoted into a job where you don’t know the people who are working for your, have you ever considered interviewing your staff to get to know them better? Have you ever considered putting a team through a facilitated behaviour profile workshop so that they learn more about themselves and each other? It’s much more effective than an afternoon of paint-ball as a team building exercise.

So when you

1) understand your company’s values and how what makes a good ‘fit” for your company

2) understand the behaviours needed for the job you’re hiring for

3) use tools validated by research

4) consistently use a disciplined hiring process

you’ll make better hires and fewer mistakes. How much is that worth to your company?

Keeping Employees without Cash

What makes an employee a key employee? We can figure this out by asking the right questions: how replaceable are their skills, and how likely are they to leave?

Once we know how are key employees are, then what? Throwing more money at the problem doesn’t usually work, because money isn’t the problem. Retention is about more than money. At least more money doesn’t always do the trick.

What does the trick? “Praise from one’s manager, attention from leaders, frequent promotions, opportunities to lead projects, and chances to join fast-track management programs are often more effective than cash.”

Leadership, and opportunities to lead.

Retaining key employees in times of change

Pay Me Now or Pay Me Later – Hiring Mistakes that Are Simple to Avoid

In my work I see four mistakes made in HR strategies and tactics over and over again:

  • Hiring too fast
  • Firing too slow
  • No follow through
  • Meet people where they to take them where you want to go

1. Hiring too fast – not having the discipline and forethought to go through some sort of structured process (any structured process) when hiring people. Hiring the wrong person cost the company 5 to 15 times their annual salary. Yes that much. No, your gut is wrong. When you start using a process you’ll figure out how wrong.

Besides paying the wrong person to do work that’s not getting done, there’s the impact to others, your time, the lost opportunities of everybody affected, how it affects your clients and customers, etc.

If you’re in a rush hiring somebody, just remember how much it’s going to cost you later. Pay me now or pay me later.

2. Firing too slow – if they’re the wrong person, they’re the wrong person. Get them out as fast as you can and move on. Yes, sometimes employees with the right behaviours (character, attitude, whatever you want to call it) can be coached, mentored, or transferred into a position that lets them play to their strengths everyday, but only in some cases. Set a six month deadline, then follow through.

(p.s. the most common behaviour you need to interview for? The ability to play well with others. )

3. No follow through – you’ve hired the best person available for the job, and they show up bright, shiny, and eager for their first day of work. This is exciting!

Oops, no desk, no computer, no introductions, no face time with you because you’re too busy putting out the fire-of-the-day? No follow-up, no one-on-one face time with the boss, no performance reviews (except one a year because the company says you have to).

Guess what, Mrs. (or Mr.) Manager: Your Most Important Job is Managing Your People. That means hiring the right people, firing the wrong ones, and give them the feedback, tools, and coaching they need to do their jobs to the best of their ability while you remove obstacles for them. Spend your time doing that, and they can take care of the fire-of-the-day for you. Happy, productive people doing your work. If you can manage that (pun intended) somebody might even promote you.

4. Meet people where they are, take them to where you want to go – This one is a little less intuitive, so I’ll use a metaphor. Imagine you’re running a company, and the (admitted hypothetical) goal is for everybody in the company to run a marathon. Maybe you’re a running shoe company, and this is a great way to promote your brand, get intimate with your customers, network with potential new hires, whatever.

So, you send out an e-mail telling everybody where and when the marathon is. You’ve arranged for media coverage, registrations, and even maybe some prizes for the highest performing employees. All set, right?

Crossing the finish line yourself, you think to yourself what a great event! We’re really going to see some great results from this. Here’s the problem, Mrs. (or Mr. Leader): Not only did you leave most of your people heaving their guts out halfway through the course. Some of them are still tying on their running shoes at the start line. A couple of them couldn’t arrange a ride, and there’s two guys having one last cigarette trying to figure out why the hell they had to get up early on a Saturday morning anyway.  Don’t forget the folks that got lost on the way to the race, because they’re still on the clock too.

Your job is to make sure as many people cross the finish line with you. Not to make sure you cross the finish line first. That’s just your ego talking.  Meet people where they are to take them where you need them to go. That’s real leadership.

[This rant inspired by HBR's How to Prevent Hiring Disasters]

Leadership in the Long-Term

Trust = Relationship multiplied by Time

When people describe the characteristics of a good leader, boss, manager, or supervisor, one behaviour that comes close to the top of most lists are adjectives like “integrity”, “trust-worthiness”, “honesty”, “credibility”. If you think back to a boss you’ve really enjoyed working for, and worked hard for, chances are you never thought they were lying to you.

One of the first teams I had the luck to be in charge of didn’t start very well. The earlier team leader’s idea of employee relationship management was sitting down with the software development team in the lab once a week and asking them “What the f*** did you do this week? What the f*** are you going to do next week? Get the f*** back to work.”

The level of trust wasn’t very high.

When I took over the two remaining developers left were ready to quit. The rest of the team had already quit, and the customer wasn’t ready to give us relief on the schedule. Trials for the land-mine detection system were less than a year away, and software control of the remotely controlled vehicles’ driving, marking, and detection systems was a critical part of getting through those trials successfully.

Luckily the technical lead assigned to the team was the best in the company. He told me who to hire (“A” players always know who the other “A” players are), and it was my job to work the corporate levers to get them. After that and agreeing to a realistic schedule, the biggest part of my job was to shield them from interference and distractions so they could focus on the work, report progress to company leadership, and get the resources they needed when they needed them. Included running out to the local cable manufacturer to fetch custom-made test harnesses if need be.

A year later we met the original schedule and budget, and successfully trialed the land-mine detector. The lesson I stumbled on there was that great people working together can do almost anything.

Those of us that have worked for somebody we didn’t trust (or didn’t trust us) have experienced some version of a living hell. Everything they say, do, or order is second-guessed, challenged, or double-checked. If employees don’t trust a supervisor how does that affect their productivity? Even if they were still trying to do a good job – which many aren’t. They’ve given up and are just trying to get by until they can find another job.

What does this mean when a boss has integrity? What can we see, feel, or hear with an honest boss? What makes us trust anybody, let alone somebody who controls our addiction to food, clothing, and shelter?

When a relationship lacks trust, everything we say and do can and is interpreted in the worst possible way. Innocent remarks or minor misunderstandings become a major crisis. Drama goes way up, and work & fun goes way down.

But trust isn’t something we can demand. It is earned. How do we build trust with anybody?

For us to get to know & trust somebody we have to feel that we understand them and that they understand us. Somebody who listens to us, answers our questions, and spends time with us is much more likely to earn our trust than somebody who talks more than they listen, avoids addressing our concerns, and gives the impression that we’re not important enough to spend time with.

Think about the people who you trust now. It’s not a big risk to say that these are relationships were built over time with people we know and like. We trust them because we know them and who they are. What they’re likely to say or do in a particular situation, what their strengths and weaknesses are, what they do when things go wrong or when they’ve made a mistake, how they behave when they think nobody is looking, or what they do when things are going well. We know what to expect.

And they know us, like us, and have spent time with us.

So it comes back to the truism that there are no shortcuts or silver bullets in leadership. To build trust we need to spend time with and put energy into relationships with the people who work for and with us. We need to figure out who they are, what they’re good at, what they’re not good at. Where they want to go with their career and their life, and how that fits in with our team, company, or enterprise. This takes time and effort.

We have to care.

We need to understand what challenges or road-blocks they’re facing, and what we can do to remove them. We need to really listen to and understand our best employees, so we can figure out how to hire more like them (not more like us), put them in the right place doing the right thing for them and for us.

Here is the biggest strategic advantage any company, club, or business can have: hiring the right people, giving them a clear goal, and getting the hell our of their way.

This sounds simple, but it is hard, repetitive work that sometimes doesn’t get the attention it deserves, and by attention I mean time in our calendar. How much time have you blocked off in your calendar to meet individually with every one of your direct reports? Does is happen regularly? How often?

If the answer is zero, what are you going to do about it?

A good leader is a trusted leader. Trust isn’t something we can demand. It is earned. Face-to-face.