Monthly Archives: March 2010

What Difference Do You Make?

Being the most forwarded poem on YouTube, you may have already seen “What Teachers Make”. I think it applies equally well to coaches, youth leaders, parents, managers who believe developing their people is their most important job, and Sergeant’s who take on wet-behind-the-ears young Lieutenants and help them become leaders. So thank-you Blake for inviting me back to Regina for the Squadron dinner this weekend, and thank-you for letting me be your “first” Lieutenant. I look forward to being back when you’re the Commanding Officer.

. . . and a shout out to Pasnak, Terry, Walter, and Randy at 734 Communication Squadron. VVV and keep the faith.

Twittering Tips for Business

Tips on using Twitter for business, from Guy Kawasaki

The New PEST Analysis – Add Culture, Stir

When taking stock of your company’s management strategy a common tool is the PEST analysis (Political, Environmental, Social, and Technological). We can now add Cultural factors. Cultural factors include cultural trends, current events, and consumer interests. Think social networking and the rise of geek culture, for example.

I Can See You

One definition of your true values is how you behave even when you think nobody is watching.

Brand Management in the Age of Yahoo

Why your chief technology officer should be continuously cruising the Internet.

Mean Girls in the Workplace

I tripped across another little gem in my blog reading this week, published in the Harvard Business Review. While they publish much which is good, I choked on this paragraph:

“2. Co-Create New Rules of Engagement. When managers share the process of defining new expectations, they create foster both individual and collective ownership of the problem. “Organizations function best when committed people work in cooperative relationships based on respect,” as Henry Mintzberg has written. “Commitment becomes contagious when people realize its immense benefits not only to the organization but to themselves.”"

I really have no idea what this means, or what I’m supposed to do with it. If I step back and think about it, I’m not even sure what the author means by “mean girls”. “Mean” is a judgment, not a behaviour. We can give feedback on behaviours, but the judgement is ours to own.

When we tell one of our staff that they’re mean, or a jerk, or gossiping, what’s their reaction going to be?

“No I’m not.”

. . . and they’re right. Them being a jerk is your conclusion after observing their behaviour. You can go back and forth all day playing the “Yes you did – no I didn’t game” if you want. Not the best use of your time though.

My recommendation is to focus on the behaviour when giving feedback. The things that people do is behaviour. Behaviour is the stuff you can see, hear, and feel. It’s the words we use, the tone of voice, our facial expression, our body language, and our work product. What you saw is fact, not a conclusion that you drew from observed behaviour. It can’t be argued with. What does being a bully, a jerk, or a gossip look like? Describe that behaviour in concrete terms.

We can then describe the consequences, and then get a commitment  to behave differently in the future. Consequences is where the judgment comes in if needed. For example: “Jeff, when we’re in a customer meeting and you roll your eyes, put your hands behind your head, lean back in your chair, and exclaim in a loud voice “That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard”, it makes you look like a jerk. Can you stop doing that? “


**many thanks to the Manager Tools Podcast for setting my feet on the path of righteousness on this issue.

http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2009/10/how_to_stop_mean_girls_in_the.html

Checklist for Stifling Yourself

With a nod to Archie Bunker (“Stifle yourself, Edith!”), a checklist of things you can do to suppress, oppress, and depress creativity. See what I did there?

Focus on Behaviour, Not Conflict Management

This article gives counsel about conflict on teams to the theme of “why can’t we just all get along?”

I think it’s the wrong approach. It puts the manager in the unpleasant and untenable position of being the counsellor, facilitator, and negotiator. From my experience I have found that role frustrating, futile, and not the best use of my time.

Try this instead:

  • Don’t play the “he said, she said” game. You can spend your entire professional life tracking down who said what to whom, and it won’t get you any closer to being effective, efficient, or delivering what you’re responsible for, and your professional career will be much shorter. Focus on behaviour, give feedback appropriate to the behaviour you observed.
  • Healthy conflict is healthy, but once a decision is made kill all other ideas. Yes, maybe it was the wrong decision, and maybe you’ll have to go back and re-evaluate your options. Until then anything else but full commitment to executing the agreed plan is whining at best and sabotage at worst.
  • Own the inputs. If you’re responsible for the deliverables, you’re responsible for the inputs you need to make the deliverables. If Paul in finance didn’t give you the numbers you need for Friday’s report, it’s not Paul’s fault. It’s yours. You wouldn’t go to your boss with that lame excuse. Why would you accept it from your staff?

Improve Your Next Speech

To make your next public speaking engagement the best speech of your life you need to get out from behind the podium, listen to your audience, and connect with your emotions.

What they want

What your employees want from you.